Christian Langmo vs Seongbin Sim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Feb at 01:03 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Langmo vs S. Sim

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Langmo 1 - 0 Sim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Christian Langmo winning 2 and Seongbin Sim winning 0. The last match between Christian Langmo and Seongbin Sim was at the M25 Launceston, 26-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Christian Langmo getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Langmo | 1 |
Sim | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Launceston(02-26-25)
C. Langmo vs S. Sim H2H Profile
C. Langmo vs S. Sim Match Preview:
As we delve into the world of tennis statistics, one can't help but ask: what role do second serve performances play in predicting match outcomes? In the past six months, Langmo has captured 50.45% of his points on the second serve, whereas Sim slightly edges him with a marginally better 50.94%. These figures not only highlight proficiency but also influence the prediction models significantly for outcomes.
How do these athletes perform when returning serves? Numbers reveal that Langmo has won 48.65% of his opponents’ second serve points, and Sim triumphs again at 49.28%. A crucial insight into first serve returns shows Langmo securing 30.73% and Sim standing stronger at 33.74%, an indicator linked to favoritism in this head-to-head clash.
Pressure handling is a key point of consideration. Langmo has an impressive record, saving 67.69% of breakpoints, while Sim has managed to save 62.68%. This statistic, invaluable for in-game betting predictions, grants Langmo a slight upper hand under pressure.
Let’s turn our attention to a broader performance overview. Langmo has maintained a 60.53% win rate over the last year (46 wins, 30 losses), while Sim outranks him with a 65% win rate (39 wins, 21 losses). However, how do surfaces influence this narrative? Langmo thrives on hard surfaces with a 60% win ratio, contrasting with his luck on indoor hard courts at 33%. Meanwhile, Sim excels on indoor hard surfaces with a 67% success rate but comparatively struggles on hard ones at 57%.
Examining the levels they've played at, Langmo's matches primarily transpire in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with a 54.17% win rate, while Sim predominantly partakes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, boasting a 66.07% win rate. However, the level of competition is crucial, as Langmo faces adversaries with an average rank of 392.51, whereas Sim competes against more formidable opponents averaging a rank of 159.
In decisive moments, if this match progresses to a deciding set, Langmo shines with a 65% success rate, compared to Sim’s 35%—a crucial insight for live predictions. Breakpoint conversion becomes pivotal too—Langmo has achieved 34.06%, while Sim stands at a robust 39.74%.
With all these statistics at play, who might emerge victoriously? Given Sim's slight edges in several key areas, including opponent quality and overall performance, he seems poised to claim victory in this matchup. Nonetheless, Langmo's ability to triumph in decisive sets might just tip the scales in unexpected moments.
Christian Langmo vs Seongbin Sim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Langmo vs S. Sim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 8 |
11 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:31:6 | Average Match Time | 1:31:6 |
84% (43/51) | 1st Serve % | 63% (50/80) |
74% (32/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (32/50) |
100% (8/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (18/30) |
22% (2/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
38% (30/80) | Return Points Win % | 22% (11/51) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Langmo Recent Matches Played
S. Sim Recent Matches Played

C. Langmo vs S. Sim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57.05% (259/195) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.93% (95/69) |
55.48% (582/467) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.68% (214/157) |
51.63% (5274/4941) | Games Win/Loss | 52.47% (1859/1684) |
58.61% (211/149) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.56% (65/52) |
51.25% (41/39) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.25% (9/7) |
28.57% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.43% (20/8) |
71.43% (5/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
2900 | Aces Total | 321 |
0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
1274 | Total Double Faults | 264 |
1:33:57 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
466.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 238.47 |
63% (17355/27658) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3101/5166) |
73% (12753/17355) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2072/3101) |
50% (5153/10303) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1010/2065) |
38% (921/2420) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (223/527) |
37% (10283/28112) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2051/5112) |
47.37% (72/80) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
61.92% (187/115) | Futures W/L | 58.13% (93/67) |
57% (256/446) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (94/161) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
55% (85/155) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (23/37) |
55% (81/146) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (20/44) |
85% (245/209) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (96/86) |
15% (245/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (96/10) |
24% (208/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (68/9) |